Cyprus-Forum.com

[Simon]

[quote]Ok well they need to count the Diaspora![/quote]

Who does? Shah first mentioned TCs that had moved abroad. Your numbers were 18% in 1960.

[quote]I want to return soon and I don't like crowded spaces [/quote]

And? Ask the 'TRNC' to remove some of their illegal settlers then.

[quote]They should also count the GC's Diaspora, and then talk about percentages[/quote]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day. If you have nothing constructive to say, please do not say anything. I am talking about something proportional and fair based on official population figures. Even Shah has agreed in principle, so please do not start with these polarising comments.

[T_C]

I know Simon but it gets so boring in here

[Simon]

[quote]Yes i have seen the figures on that GREEK site before, they also seem to count the minorities other than TCs along with themselves...

And yes GCs left too, however many people did also move there since, ie. the Chinese, BUT people have been deserting the TRNC since the 60s, but your site seems to claim that our population went up between 1960-1973, how could this be if everyone was trying to flee the island or even being "assisted" to leave, due to the horrible living conditions?

So excuse me if i am extremely skeptical about everything involving GCs on this island, because i cant help but view them as the relentless devotee's of a long term plan to cleanse this island from Turks...[/quote]

Shah, go to any independent website, check the official British figures, anything; they will all tell you TCs were roughly 18% in 1960. Please do not play games. Nobody has been deserting the 'TRNC' in the 60s, because the invasion was not even until 1974! So there was no 'TRNC'!Stop trying to find excuses to grab more land; the facts are clear. You have already accepted yourself an 80/20 divide. The minorities are counted in the GC side because they chose to become part of the GC community in the 1960 Agreement. In any event, I suggested 80/20, which divides the minorities between the states anyway. How would the partition I have proposed cleanse Turks from the island, it is giving you what you want, isn't this the whole point?

[shahmaran]

Games?!?! Where are you actually from Simon?

My entire family has always been living there, EVERYONE i know who is old enough and still alive can tell you how the TCs were being forced to move elsewhere directly or indirectly since the 60s, no one wanted to live prisoned into their village with the GCs controlling everything around them and making life a living hell for the ones who stayed, get your facts straight Simon, i am not after grabbing more land, i don't care about land, i got PLENTY thank you, i just want freedom and justice...

[Get Real!]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day.

I've thought about that too and have since realised that it may not be such a bad idea after all... we now get to treat him like shit!

[T_C]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day.

I've thought about that too and have since realised that it may not be such a bad idea after all... we now get to treat him like shit!

Bring it on bitch!

[Simon]

None of what you just posted is relevant facts Shah. Do you accept official independent figures or anecdotes? You post no facts here, just vague remarks about what the people you know say.

FACT: TCs were 18% in 1960 when the first agreement for independence was signed. Therefore, 80/20 is more than fair. You agree one minute, but then your greedy instincts kick in and you want more! You want more, by trying to pretend you were 30% or something; this means you are trying to grab more land in my book for your illegal state!

Find me one independent, verifiable source that states TCs were 30% or even close to that, at anytime during the 1960s?

[shahmaran]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day.

I've thought about that too and have since realised that it may not be such a bad idea after all... we now get to treat him like shit!

T_C has my full respect, he is not only capable of putting forward very good arguments along with solid facts to back them up, he is also very capable of putting dickheads like yourself into his right place when he needs to, and he does it in style as well!

[T_C]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day.

I've thought about that too and have since realised that it may not be such a bad idea after all... we now get to treat him like shit!

T_C has my full respect, he is not only capable of putting forward very good arguments along with solid facts to back them up, he is also very capable of putting dickheads like yourself into his right place when he needs to, and he does it in style as well!

[Get Real!]

I used to like the way you spoke TC, very reasonable and sensible. However, as time has moved on, you are becoming more like Zan, VP etc every day.

I've thought about that too and have since realised that it may not be such a bad idea after all... we now get to treat him like shit!

T_C has my full respect, he is not only capable of putting forward very good arguments along with solid facts to back them up, he is also very capable of putting dickheads like yourself into his right place when he needs to, and he does it in style as well!

T_C... [sob] I think you've made yourself... [sob] a faithful friend [sob]...