Who are we taking for a ride?
By Loucas Charalambous
IN LAST Sunday’s column, I referred to the proposals by the Greek Cypriot side, made in the framework of the July 8 agreement, and argued that the main political objective of our leadership was to use this procedure in order to preserve the status quo.
The fact that these absurd proposals, aimed at turning the Cyprus talks 40 years back, have prompted very little comment by media pundits is proof that they are party to the political game being played by our leadership, whose only concern is to stay in power, not caring that every day that passes brings partition closer. The policy of ‘staying as we are’ is being openly promoted nowadays.
President Papadopoulos has no qualms talking about his objective to representatives of organised groups that visit him at his office. This is how he explains his wise policy to his guests – because under present conditions, there can be no settlement that would be better that the current situation, it is preferable to stay as we are.
It is therefore no coincidence that the documents submitted by the president’s aide Tasos Tzionis for discussion by the working groups, as envisaged by the July 8 agreement, included 93 chapters, some of which were broken down into sub-chapters as well. The more these chapters – and the more complicated – the more time-consuming will be the negotiations.
It is interesting to note the slapdash way in which these 93 chapters have been drafted. Not even the most open-minded person could have accepted that they were written with the aim of being discussed within the framework of a serious procedure. I would bet that the person who drafted these did not spend more than an hour or two putting them together. The proposals are so badly written and incoherent that only a fool would have believed that nine months were needed to draft them.
In my last column, I referred to the ludicrous chapter which included the heading “creation of federal national parks (status and administration)” to give an idea of the seriousness of the proposals submitted by Tzionis. I thought I would refer to another of the chapters today, as it perfectly illustrates our bad faith and our transparent craftiness.
The second chapter for the working group dealing with the territorial issue is on the following: “Suspension (moratorium) of the development of properties and of transactions (such as sale, rental, mortgaging, advertising etc) involving refugee properties.” This was the topic that created the strongest reaction by the Turkish Cypriots. The craftiness behind this position is blatantly clear – as soon as the working groups commence, we would ask for the use of Greek Cypriot-owned properties to be stopped. If the Turks agree, they would leave all the land that had not already been built on, and we will be taking them for a ride indefinitely at the working groups. In the meantime, they could build their houses in the sea.
Common sense dictates that, because most Turkish Cypriot property is in the south, the issue of properties could only be resolved in an overall settlement. No sensible person could expect the construction of houses in the north to stop until we find the desire to solve the Cyprus problem. The Turkish Cypriots are going to carry on building and using Greek Cypriot properties for as long as the island remains divided.
This provision is based on an assumption our leaders always make – that they are the cleverest people in the world and everyone else is stupid. This is why even our friends of yesterday in Europe do not bother taking us seriously any more. This is why even the diplomats representing friendly Arab states tell us: “Your problem is your president.”
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.ph ... 6&cat_id=1