Cyprus-Forum.com

[Piratis]

And you didn't answer this question: Would you accept a solution that will not be against our human and legal rights?

[zan]

Papadopoulos didn't ask for anything that would harm the human or other rights of any Cypriot. As a Cypriot President he oughts to defend the sovereignty of this country and human and legal rights of its people.

By the way, we were not the ones that wanted separate elections you did. Personally I would be more than glad to modify the 1960 constitution and have the Cypriot president elected by all Cypriots as one body. In that way you can come and vote against him. If the TCs don't want him he wouldn't be able to be re-elected since last time he won with just a bit more than 50%, and TCs are the 18%.

The point is that YOU elected him knowing his past history with relation to the TCs. We saw Denktas as an obstacle and an afront to you so we voted otherwise.

[Get Real!]

Papadopoulos didn't ask for anything that would harm the human or other rights of any Cypriot. As a Cypriot President he oughts to defend the sovereignty of this country and human and legal rights of its people.

By the way, we were not the ones that wanted separate elections you did. Personally I would be more than glad to modify the 1960 constitution and have the Cypriot president elected by all Cypriots as one body. In that way you can come and vote against him. If the TCs don't want him he wouldn't be able to be re-elected since last time he won with just a bit more than 50%, and TCs are the 18%.

The point is that YOU elected him knowing his past history with relation to the TCs. We saw Denktas as an obstacle and an afront to you so we voted otherwise.

There is not a shred of evidence linking TP with any TC death or injury. My challenge has been in place for ages and the promoters of this old wife's tale, such as Bananiot, have failed miserably because in reality TP was just the team leader of Varosi (an administrative position) in EOKA "A" fighting against British colonialism during 55..59 period!

[Murataga]

There is not a shred of evidence linking TP with any TC death or injury. My challenge has been in place for ages and the promoters of this old wife's tale, such as Bananiot, have failed miserably because in reality TP was just the team leader of Varosi (an administrative position) in EOKA "A" fighting against British colonialism during 55..59 period!

(1) You are in very dangerous waters if you are defending TP for illegalities against the TCs

(2) Yes he was never officially a member of the EOKA-B (at least to my knowledge) however he has actively promoted ENOSIS politically although it was illegal after 1960

(3) He was involved in drawing up the Akritas Plan. The President of the House of Representatives Glafkos Clerides, the Minister of Labour Tassos Papadopoulos and Yeorgadjis were the masterminds of th Akritas Organisation. If I am not mistaken, Clerides in his book "My Deposition" and on an interview with Politis has exploited TP`s involvement aswell. Below are just a few articles that mention it. I am not home right now due to business. But can show you more references his involvement in the Akritas Plan when I get back if you continue to deny.


(Le Monde Diplomatique)
http://mondediplo.com/2004/05/07cyprus

(Cyprus Mail)
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/news/main.ph ... 2&cat_id=1

(Diplomatic Observer)
http://www.diplomaticobserver.com/news_read.asp?id=1558

[Piratis]

You keep refering to the "Akritas plan" which if it existed it was merely a document. The plans that the Turks put into action in Cyprus are 100 times worst than any "Akritas plan" and yet you support them, right? So if Papadopoulos is criminal what that makes you?

[DT.]

Could no one answer the question regarding accepting a solution that violates your human rights?

[Sotos]

Could no one answer the question regarding accepting a solution that violates your human rights?

The answer is no. But if you ask a racist Turk what he will tell you is that it is ok to violate the human rights of OTHERS.

[Bananiot]

Kifeas wrote (for the upteenth time)

Poor Bananiot, so often your arguments are so empty and flat, that only people with very low IQ must be taking you seriously

Well, I know someone that takes me very seriously and you Kifeas know him much better. In fact, this geezer, hastily answers my posts before the ink has time to dry out. One day he will die in the stampede.

For those with a higher than average IQ I might add, to my previous post, that there is no difference between Denktash and Papadopoulos. The international community knows this very well (despite their low IQ). Denktash did his level best to avert the Turkish Cypriots from voting "yes" and Papadopoulos did his level best to avert the Greek Cypriots from voting "yes" in the referenda of April 2004. The Turkish Cypriots showed immense maturity and a solid and patriotic will for solution while the Greek Cypriots, rather immaturely and selfishly, believed Papadopoulos that we were about to be offered a much better solution, a European solution (sic) that would take all refugees back to their homes, as though nothing had happened since 1963. The Annan Plan was an option we did not take.

When will our thick head understand that there is no ideal solution to the Cyprus issue but options, and while we are waiting for better options we will say goodbye to half of Cyprus and prepare the way for boundaries, not with the pseudo state, but with Turkey of the 80 million souls. This in essence is what Papadopoulos has achieved and people like Kifeas run after him and cheer him on ...

[DT.]

Kifeas wrote (for the upteenth time)

Poor Bananiot, so often your arguments are so empty and flat, that only people with very low IQ must be taking you seriously

Well, I know someone that takes me very seriously and you Kifeas know him much better. In fact, this geezer, hastily answers my posts before the ink has time to dry out.

For those with a higher than average IQ I might add, to my previous post, that there is no difference between Denktash and Papadopoulos. The international community knows this very well (despite their low IQ). Denktash did his level best to avert the Turkish Cypriots from voting "yes" and Papadopoulos did his level best to avert the Greek Cypriots from voting "yes" in the referenda of April 2004. The Turkish Cypriots showed immense maturity and a solid and patriotic will for solution while the Greek Cypriots, rather immaturely, believed Papadopoulos that we were about to be offered a much better solution, a European solution (sic) that would take all refugees back to their homes, as though nothing had happened sice 1963. The Annan Plan was an option we did not take. There is no ideal solution to the Cyprus issue but options and while we are waiting for better options we will say goodbye to half of Cyprus and prepare the way for boundaries, not with the pseudo state, but with Turkey of the 80 millions. This in essence is what Papadopoulos has achieved and people like Kifeas run after him and cheer him on ...

We'd probably be thinking of ways to go to the UN to condemn Turkey for not honouring her signature and not withdrawing to the agreed levels yet (just like the 8th July signature), only we wouldn't be accepted in the UN because we would be a GC statelet.....the Republic was dissolved a few years ago.

[Bananiot]

Interesting, so why does Papadopoulos insist on negotiations directly with Turkey. You should advice him that he will be wasting his time.