by mem101 » Mon Apr 30, 2007 1:35 am
I think the article is more relevant to subjects like History, Sociology, Philosophy, Literature, and less to Maths, Science, Language. In the latter, in the early stages of education that you are referring to, there is often a very well defined and concrete method for solving a problem, or making a statement. The laws that these subjects abide by must be understood by students, and it must also be understood that sometimes there is only one solution to a problem. For the former group of subjects, however I do agree that there is never an easy solution and that inquisitive minds may be bred in the manner which you are suggesting. I do agree that free and speculative thought should be encouraged in the classroom, but I also believe that it is not the only thing that should be taught. Discipline and boundaries are also required in certain subjects and in life in general, so a balance must be found. If a student then continues to higher education in Maths or a Science then the skills required for success at such a level are likely to be present in a student who has had a well balanced foundation in education.
Is this the sort of feedback that you were looking for? Any comments about my thoughts?