Murataga wrote:Cencorship can be easily be framed to look like it is part of a legal process, clearly as in this case. Hence the producer rightfully asks:
But the producer questioned why the other side had waited until now to make their move and why they had not seized other assets belonging to the company if money was the issue.
This is a crystal clear proof of the intolerance of the racist and illegal GC administration and displays how far they are willing to go with their agenda.
This is what the producer says... It is just HIS opinion. We don't know the whole story. We don't know what assets if any the company has. Perhaps the only asset they have that worths something is that film.
In my opinion if it were an organised censorship they wouldn't let the film go for almost one week.They would stop it at the premiere on Saturday. This did not happen. The film was presented from Saturday until next Thursday.It only had 2 nights (out of 7) left. And the Cinema schedule was for THE QUEEN next
Perhaps the film owner can claim it was an organised attempt for censorship, or even a state supported one. My personal opinion is he is just seeing things and trying to attract publicity.
Personally I haven't heard of this film, here with this publicity the film maker just earned another client, I will go see it as soon as it's on Cinemas again.
I hope you agree that if it were an organised censorship they wouldn't let it go on stage not even from 1 night.