Can they kick-start the talks?
By Jean Christou
THE INTERNATIONAL community pushed ahead with efforts for the resumption of talks about talks yesterday during a meeting between UN Chief of Mission Michael Moller and the ambassadors of the Security Council’s five permanent members.
Last week the five ambassadors of France, Britain, China, Russia and the US met Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat and before that the Security Council issued a statement calling for the July 8 agreement to move forward.
The five ambassadors reiterated the readiness of the international community to support and assist the UN-brokered July 8 process that is designed to lead to a resumption of full-fledged negotiations on the Cyprus issue.
So far the process has gone nowhere, and ten days ago the Turkish Cypriot side called a halt to ongoing meetings between senior aides to the two sides in order to review the situation.
The review was submitted to the UN on Monday, and yesterday it was forwarded to the Greek Cypriot side.
Without going into details, Government Spokesman Christodoulos Pashiardis said yesterday it appeared from the response that the Turkish Cypriot side was not exactly enamoured of the July 8 process.
Pashiardis said yesterday the UN had passed on to them a letter by Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat addressed to the UN Secretary General. It contained the Turkish side's positions on the current phase of the Cyprus problem and especially with regard to the July 8 agreement.
Pashiardis said the Greek Cypriot side would not take a stance until after examining the letter.
“I will restrict myself to saying that, judging by the facts at the moment, the Turkish side is not very thrilled about the July 8 agreement,” Pashiardis said.
Commenting on remarks by Hasan Ercakica, Talat's spokesman, that the Greek Cypriot side was trying to implement packages that should have been on the agenda of the technical committees and working groups, Pashiardis said: “Unfortunately for Mr Ercakica, neither the UN nor the international community, I believe, agree with his position and view.”
He was referring to a new package of measures by the government for economic aid to the Turkish Cypriots that is designed to pre-empt any move by the EU for direct trade with the north.
“We sincerely do not understand how and why Mr Ercakica is smelling enmity in the package of new measures we are proposing for the Turkish Cypriots and giving this gesture of ours any political dimension,” said Pashiardis.
”If our effort to financially strengthen the Turkish Cypriots and for the economic unification of our country is perceived by Mr Ercakica as a hostile action, I am sure that the vast majority of the Turkish Cypriots, who are already enjoying the previous social and economic measures we gave, will totally disagree with him.”
He said it was obvious that the main motive of the Turkish Cypriot leadership in seeking direct trade was political and not economic.