Cyprus-Forum.com

[Alexandros Lordos]

Any moral arguments by the Greek Cypriot authorities for the return of such land to its pre-1974 owners dissipated with their opposition to the Annan plan 

After reading this insulting statement, I didn't even bother to read the rest of the article. I just noticed the author lying at the end, when he said that ECHR petitions only award damages against Turkey, and not return of property. The requirement for Turkey to return the Loizidou property was simply postponed until 2005.

[brother]

I thought they were going to pass judgement on wether it will be returned in a court case for 2005.

[Alexandros Lordos]

I thought they were going to pass judgement on wether it will be returned in a court case for 2005.

Oh ... I am not sure to be honest.

[-mikkie2-]

The judgement has already been passed. 2005 is when Turkey is expected to enforce the judgement.

[brother]

So whats the upcoming court case with lozidous for then?

[Alexandros Lordos]

Brother,

I think the attached link will clarify the issue ... right from the horse's mouth!

http://www.trncpresidency.org/press/news/loizidu.htm

[cannedmoose]

I think the attached link will clarify the issue ... right from the horse's mouth!

Given Rauf's emotional attachment to the donkey, immortalised in his statement that donkeys are the only true Cypriots (I'm sure the moufflons were a bit miffed), surely the expression ...from the donkey's mouth would be more apt

[Alexandros Lordos]

[brother]

heh..heh..lol

[pantelis]

The Turkish Foreign Ministry said the decision to pay up did not set a precedent for the future. In a statement, the Ministry said the decision was unjust but the payment was necessary to protect respect for the Human Rights Court.

I think, the entire statement is an insult to donkeys!!!