by Murataga » Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:59 am
Reaction to realities from GCs on the forum… quite typical but most unfortunately rather sad. I do not have the time to answer all of you; and I will certainly not answer some of you with the awe of the logic in my statement have chosen to respond with personal insults.
Pyrpolizer- first argued that TCs are not Turks and than went on to name all Cypriots “bastardized”. So, will leave him alone as we all need some entertainment from time to time on the forum. However, I owe him an explanation regarding the nickname. Murataga is the name of one of the villages where 88 TCs were massacred and put into mass grave in 1974 by GCs.
Piratis- in his typical approach to arguments he can’t answer has tried to divert the subject of my initial post (which was simply stating that we are not “one” people) by starting to type his “magical” numbers on the Cyprus conflict and attempted to pose some of his pathetic analogies. Piratis first asked:
maybe you should ask for a separate country in a part of Bulgaria, a part of Greece, a part of Germany and a part of every other country that a Turkish minority exists?
First of all this has nothing to do with what I initially posted. I was simply stating that there are two distinct communities in Cyprus that have in the past and will in the future endure problems when put under each other’s administration or sovereignty and forced to live as ONE. As far as your looser and demagogue question is concerned… Of course we do not ask this and your examples mean absolutely nothing. The history, the population, the political circumstances, the legal establishment, international agreements and etc. of the situation in all of these are completely different than the one in Cyprus. This state was established on a partnership status. TCs are the partners of this state. In this state innocent TCs were attacked and murdered when they resisted giving up their legal rights as partners. TCs were put under a siege and placed under an embargo when they resisted giving up their legal rights as partners. And when they gather in a zone to protect themselves out of pure instinct for survival against lethal violence directed at them you claim that they stole GC property. This is no different than throwing the first punch in someone’s face and than blaming him for property damage because the blood from his nose spilled on your carpet.
because some of them were smarted and kicked out all the Turks when they were liberated from them so now the Turks can not have claims on their countries
This racist and hateful comment is nothing different than someone saying to YOU that perhaps the Ottomans should have “kicked out” (by whatever means necessary) all the GCs from Cyprus when they had the chance so that GCs can not claim anything today. Surely, you realize how simple such a task would have been for the Ottomans given the balance of power in that era. Yet, peculiarly in your next sentence you try to label TCs as racists… Such comments are both meaningless and shallow; so I suggest that don’t repeat them for the sake of whatever credibility you have left.
Yeap, as I always said the Intercommunal conflict was over by 1968 and it had absolutely nothing to do with the Turkish invasion that came a whole 7 years later. The excuse for the invasion was the coup.
No, the conflict was not over in 68, it had only transformed to a further stage which was at least inhumane and illegal as the pre-68 period. TCs were forced to hide in enclaves to survive. By 1968 TCs had already been muscled out of the government, GCs had hijacked the title of the government of Cyprus ; under this illegal and hijacked title they were passing resolutions on international platforms against TCs where TCs were not even being given a hearing; under this illegal and hijacked title they had sieged the TCs and placed the TCs under an embargo that brought them to the brink of starvation and extinction had it not been for the aid of Turkey. Perhaps you might be right to claim that not as many shots were fired after 68, but why bother with the ammunition when you can starve them to death, right?
The first and foremost illegality belongs to GCs for initially depriving TCs from their legal rights in the state, murdering them for resisting to this deprivation, murdering them in the lunatic crusade for ENOSIS, and putting them under a siege to starve to death.