Get Real! wrote:skipper wrote:Oh of course, now we "don't deserve" powersharing because we're so poor forgetting to mention that you've done your best to try limit us ecomonically since 1963, I'm glad you're here to set the record straight. Nearly every single sector that has led to GC prosperity has been external, tourists, shipping, banking/offshore etc.. infact even the reduction in the % of workforce in farming after 1974 had a positive impact after the short term shock so please stop talking about stagnation as if there is something in the TC makeup that is lazy and incapable.
What's in it for us baby? what do you think I am the Red Cross???
What are you on about? We don't want anything from you, I'm just pointing out that nearly all economic growth you have attained has been due to the fact that you maintain the RoC from 1960, you then twisted that to some kind of demand from you for something, which is just a typical stereotype of TC's by GC's.
You're harping on about how due to your now increased economic position it should some how negate the political powersharing because we "dont deserve it", we've never asked for a slice of your cake infact we've wanted to make our own cake larger but you've done everything you can to make sure that does n't happen. It's the GC that want everything 100% unified but then go moan that under that unification we'ill get more than we deserve, dont you see the contradiction here? You then go on to say if TC's become economically more prosperous they won't want unification so its a complete no win senario.
The only "trump card" you've got under your sleeve is a military "threat"!
Something that's losing value very rapidly these days...
Again, where did this come into the conversion? did n't realise this had become a schoolkid playground argument.